U.S. healthcare spending reached a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $3.49 trillion in April, 4.4 percent higher than the same month the year prior, according to an Ann Arbor, Mich.-based Altarum’s Center for Sustainable Health Spending report.

A survey of 302 primary care physicians with hospital affiliations and 150 health plan executives examines progress that must still be realized to achieve value-based care. These include achieving better alignment between providers and payers and improvements in electronic health records to bridge critical gaps. Some widely differing views exist between providers and insurers on common issues.

As part of a program to encourage providers to shift to EHRs, the federal government incorrectly paid hundreds of millions of dollars in incentive payments to healthcare professionals who did not actually meet Meaningful Use requirements. The HHS Office of Inspector General estimates that inappropriate payments to eligible professionals totaled $729 million between May 2011 and June 2014.

Better patient engagement is a nearly universal goal for health care providers, but real barriers exist, say health care leaders and clinicians. Nearly two-thirds (63%) of respondents to NEJM Catalyst’s latest Insights Council survey on patient engagement call the time investment required by health teams the biggest challenge in designing patient engagement into care delivery.The underlying issue is reimbursements, says Bertrand Ross, MD, FACC, FACP, Medical Director at Virginia-based Optima Health, a subsidiary of Sentara Healthcare providing health plan coverage to more than 450,000 members. “The problem is that incentives [for patient engagement] are not aligned. The time and effort to educate, motivate, and troubleshoot issues regarding patient engagement are not recompensed very well at present.” Create alignment, he says, and the time investment challenge will disappear.”

Researchers have found that an average of only 38 percent of emergency medicine healthcare professionals — including physicians, physician assistants and nurse practitioners — accurately estimated the costs for three common conditions seen in the emergency department. Improving that percentage has the potential to lower costs for patients and the overall healthcare system, according to a study published in The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

Retail health clinics are popping up everywhere. Nowadays, they reside in pharmacies, chain drug stores such as Walgreens and CVS, in supermarkets and big-box stores, such as Walmart and Target.

Revenue-cycle teams in healthcare are applying new approaches to tackle an old problem—claims denials—according to a pair of finance executives who participated in a recent HealthLeaders Media Roundtable event.

A sweeping analysis of billing records from more than 12,000 emergency physicians nationwide suggests dramatically inflated and wildly varying charges for services ranging from CT scans to wound suturing.

“There are massive disparities in service costs across emergency rooms and that price gouging is the worst for the most vulnerable populations,” says study senior author Martin Makary, MD, MPH, professor of surgery at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, in remarks accompanying the report.

“This study adds to the growing pile of evidence that to address the huge disparities in healthcare, healthcare pricing needs to be fairer and more transparent,” he says.

Diagnostic errors, no matter their origin, are costly.

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine—Health and Medicine Division found that 5% of U.S. adults who seek outpatient care each year experience a diagnostic error.

Diagnosis-related payments, Johns Hopkins researchers found, amounted to $38.8 billion between 1986 and 2010.

But there are things physicians and care teams can do to improve diagnostic accuracy.